Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultramercial

Ultramercial, LLC is an online advertising company. The company primarily specializes in interactive advertisements, which emphasize user engagement in exchange for access to premium content, such as video, games, and public internet access. The company claimed that its system was effective, with a 4.84% average ...

www.eff.org/files/2014/11/14/ultramercial-remand-opinion_10-1544.opinion.pdf

Nov 14, 2014 ... that granted WildTangent, Inc.'s (“WildTangent”) motion to dismiss Ultramercial, LLC and Ultramercial, Inc.'s. (collectively “Ultramercial”) patent infringement com- plaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). See Ultramercial,. LLC v. Hulu, LLC, 657 F. 3d 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2011), vacat- ed sub nom. WildTangent, Inc. v.

www.patentdocs.org/2014/11/ultramercial-inc-v-hulu-llc-fed-cir-2014.html

Nov 16, 2014 ... By Michael Borella -- Ultramercial sued Hulu, YouTube, and WildTangent for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7346545. Hulu and YouTube were eventually dismissed from the case. On a 12(b)(6) motion, and without construing the claims, the District Court held that the '545 patent does not claim ...

www.bitlaw.com/source/cases/patent/Ultramercial_v_Hulu.html

Sep 15, 2011 ... Analysis and full text of the Ultramercial, LLC v. Hulu, LLC Federal Circuit case involving statutory subject matter under Section 101 of the US Patent Act.

www.ipbrief.net/2015/02/25/ultramercial-inc-v-hulu-llc

Feb 25, 2015 ... On November, 14, 2014 the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) upheld the decision of the district court, that Ultramercial's '545 patent, directed at a method for distributing copyrighted material over the internet where a consumer receives a copyrighted product for free in exchange for ...

casetext.com/case/ultramercial-inc-v-hulu

Nov 14, 2014 ... In our original decision, we reversed the district court's holding that granted WildTangent, Inc.'s (“WildTangent”) motion to dismiss Ultramercial, LLC and Ultramercial, Inc.'s (collectively “Ultramercial”) patent infringement complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). See Ultramercial, LLC v. Hulu, LLC, 657 F.3d ...

www.bilskiblog.com/blog/2014/12/the-day-the-exception-swallowed-the-rule-is-any-software-patent-eligible-after-ultramercial-iii.html

Dec 2, 2014 ... On November 14, 2014, exception did in fact swallow the rule in the Federal Circuit's decision Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, 2010-1544, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21633 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2014) (“Ultramercial III”). Judge Lourie, writing for the panel of Judges O'Malley and Mayer, found Ultramercial's patent ...

www.law360.com/articles/738344/top-10-alice-cases-of-2015

Dec 17, 2015 ... Ultramercial LLC v. WildTangent (Supreme Court, June 29, 2015). Many patent litigators are familiar with the ongoing saga of the Ultramerical case, which involves Section 101 and has been up and down on appeal to the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court repeatedly. The case ended with a whimper this ...

www.finnegan.com/en/insights/patent-eligibility-in-the-wake-of-alice-ultramercial-iii.html

Dec 4, 2014 ... The Federal Circuit recently issued its highly anticipated decision in Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, No. 2010-1544 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2014) (“Ultramercial III”). The Federal Circuit had twice previously declared Ultramercial's claims eligible for patent protection under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Then came the ...