Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posadas_de_Puerto_Rico_Associates_v._Tourism_Co._of_Puerto_Rico

Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates, dba Condado Holiday Inn v. Tourism Company of Puerto Rico et al. 478 U.S. 328 (1986); 106 S. Ct 2968; 92 L. Ed. 2d 266, was a 1986 appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States to determine whether Puerto Rico's Games of Chance Act of 1948 is in legal compliance with the ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrams_v._United_States

Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States upholding the 1918 Amendment to the Espionage Act of 1917, which made it a criminal offense to urge curtailment of production of the materials necessary to the war against Germany with intent to hinder the progress ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosen_v._United_States

Rosen v. United States, 161 U.S. 29 (1896), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court dealing with the concept of obscenity. In a decision written by Justice Harlan, the Court upheld the conviction of the defendant to 13 months hard labor and a fine of $1 for allegedly using the United States Postal Service to  ...

www.law360.com/articles/438873/ameritrans-unit-hasn-t-repaid-20m-loan-us-alleges

May 6, 2013 ... SBIC provides loans to private equity firms licensed by the Small Business Administration for the purpose of financing small businesses. Elk is represented by Justin V. Shur of MoloLamken LLP. The case is United States of America v. Elk Associates Funding Corp., case number 2:13-0018, in the U.S. ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linmark_Associates,_Inc._v._Township_of_Willingboro

Linmark Associates, Inc., v. Township of Willingboro, 431 U.S. 85 (1977), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States found that an ordinance prohibiting the posting of "for sale" and "sold" signs on real estate within the town violated the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protections for ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1137439.html

Aug 5, 2008 ... If the offense is a “course-of-conduct offense,” this court then applies “the impulse test,” treating “as one offense all violations that arise from that singleness of thought, purpose or action, which may be deemed a single 'impulse.' ” Id. at 449 ( quoting United States v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., 344 U.S. 218, ...

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/07/13/15-15799.pdf

Jul 13, 2017 ... UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC.;. W.M. BEATY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.;. ANN MCKEEVER HATCH, as trustee of the Hatch 1987 revocable trust;. RICHARD L. GREENE, As ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agency_for_International_Development_v._Alliance_for_Open_Society_International,_Inc.

Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. was a 2013 United States Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that conditions imposed on recipients of certain federal grants amounted to a restriction of freedom of speech and violated the First Amendment.

www.provident.com/AboutUs.aspx

Provident Funding has fostered a disciplined, yet entrepreneurial culture since inception in 1992. A firm commitment to a low cost structure was designed to deliver industry-leading rates in all interest rate environments. Passing cost savings to our highly qualified borrowers has earned us a solid reputation in the industry as ...