Nov 1, 2011 ... Minneci v. Pollard ... Respondent. Richard Lee Pollard, et al. ... of California dismissed Pollard's suit. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, concluding that the Supreme Court recognized an implied cause of action for injury caused by "a federal agent acting under his authority." ...
The case was similar in its character to the two cases of City of Mobile v. Emanuel et al., reported in 1 How. 95, and Pollard's Lessee v. Files, 2 How. 592. In the report of the first of these cases, the locality of the ground and nature of the case are explained. In 42 U. S. 1 How. 97, it is stated that the court charged the jury, that,.
Jan 10, 2012 ... The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. MINNECI ET AL. v. POLLARD ET ...
John R. Fisher, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., and Elizabeth H. Danello, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee. Kenneth Lasson, Baltimore, Md., was on the brief for amici curiae, Law Professors, et al., urging reversal. Before: RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN and ...
Holding: Because state tort law authorizes adequate alternative damages actions in this case, no Bivens remedy can be implied. Judgment: Reversed, 8-1, in an ... Reply Brief for Margaret Minneci et al. Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners. Brief for the United States of America. Merits Briefs for the Respondents.
Whether the Court should imply a cause of action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against individual employees of private companies that contract with the Federal government to provide prison services, where the plaintiff has adequate alternative remedies ...
... opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. MINNECI et al. v. POLLARD et al.
United States Supreme Court. POLLARD v. E. I. du PONT de NEMOURS & CO., ( 2001). No. 00-763. Argued: April 23, 2001 Decided: June 4, 2001. Petitioner Pollard sued ... 253, 42 U. S. C. §2000e et seq. After a ... For the purposes of this opinion, it is not necessary for us to explain when front pay is an appropriate remedy.
Case opinion for US Supreme Court POLLARD v. HAGAN. Read the ... POLLARD v. HAGAN, (1845). Argued: Decided: January 1, 1845. [44 U.S. 212, 213] THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Supreme Court of Alabama. It was an ... Emanuel et al., reported in 1 How., 95, and Pollard's lessee v. Files, 2 Id., 592 ...