United States v. Stewart, 348 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 2003) and 451 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2006), is a Ninth Circuit case involving a challenge to the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o) under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution . The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found against the ...
United States v. Stewart may refer to: United States v. Stewart (1795), 2 U.S. 343 ( 1795); United States v. Stewart (1940), 311 U.S. 60 (1940), interpreting a definition of the term "income" for the purpose of tax liability; United States v. Stewart (2003), 348 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 2003), is a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case heard ...
United States v. Stuart. No. 87-1064. Argued December 5, 1988. Decided February 28, 1989. 489 U.S. 353. Syllabus. Articles XIX and XXI of the 1942 Convention Respecting Double Taxation (1942 Convention) between the United States and Canada require the United States, upon request and consistent with United ...
Case opinion for US Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. STUART. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
Jun 10, 2016 ... Carson (Stuart) Judgment. Related Case(s):. U.S. v. Control Components, Inc.: Docket No. 09-CR-162-JVS (07/22/09). U.S. v. Richard Morlok: Docket No. 09- CR-005-JVS (01/07/09). U.S. v. Mario Covino: Docket No. 08-CR-336-JVS (12/17 /08). U.S. v. Flavio Ricotti Docket No: 09-CR-077-JVS (04/08/09).
Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart. Media. Oral Argument - April 19, 1976; Opinion Announcement - June 30, 1976. Opinions. Syllabus · View Case. Petitioner. Nebraska Press Association et al. Respondent. Hugh Stuart, Judge, District Court of Lincoln County, Nebraska et al. ... Citation. 427 US 539 (1976) ...
The proliferation of gag orders began after a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that an order barring the press from publishing information ... on the sources of information, making an end-run around the rule that the press itself generally cannot be restricted. (Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart).
It's tempting to dismiss CAAF's opinion in United States v. Stewart, No. 11-0440/ MC, 71 M.J. 38 (C.A.A.F. Mar. 6, 2012) (CAAFlog case page) (link to slip op.) ... In that Captain Nicholas S. Stewart, U.S. Marine Corps, on active duty, did, at or near Fairfax, Virginia, on or about 17 May 2008, engage in a sexual act, to wit: using ...
Stewart v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 226 N. Y. 302, 123 N. E. 382. The latter concluded that the reasons which constrained us to hold the Compensation Law inapplicable to an employe engaged in maritime work—Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U. S. 205, 37 Sup. Ct. 524, 61 L. Ed. 1086, L. R. A. 1918C, 451, Ann. Cas.