Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago

McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that found that the right of an individual to " keep and bear arms" is protected under the Second Amendment is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the states. The decision ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Miller

United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), was a Supreme Court case that involved a Second Amendment challenge to the National Firearms Act of 1934 ( NFA). Miller is often cited in the ongoing American gun politics debate, as both sides claim that it supports their position.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/307/174/case.html

Only weapons that have a reasonable relationship to the effectiveness of a well- regulated militia under the Second Amendment are free from government regulation.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/504/505/case.html

OCTOBER TERM, 1991. Syllabus. UNITED STATES v. THOMPSON/CENTER ARMS CO. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. No. ... a tax of $200 per unit upon any-. * Richard E. Gardiner filed a brief for Senator Larry E. Craig et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/465/354

465 U.S. 354 (104 S.Ct. 1099, 79 L.Ed.2d 361). UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. ONE ASSORTMENT OF 89 FIREARMS. No. 82-1047. Argued: Nov. 30, 1983. Decided: Feb. 22, 1984. opinion, BURGER [HTML]. Syllabus. Upon trial in Federal District Court, defendant Mulcahey, who asserted the defense of entrapment, was ...

www.pcadv.org/Resources/STOPTABull_Voisine_09182016.pdf

Jan 4, 2017 ... The United State's Supreme Court's ruling in U.S. v. Voisine et al. upholds the ban on firearms possession for those convicted of misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence. The decision extends previous rulings to prohibit gun possession whether the original domestic violence assault was found to be.

jpfo.org/filegen-a-m/miller.htm

in deciding U.S. v. Miller the Court only declared that ownership of a firearm could be restricted if, and only if, it had no connection to military or militia activity ... In keeping with our pledge to give you all of the facts, we set forth below not just the facts in the record, but facts that might have moved the Court to decide differently, ...

www.atf.gov/news/pr/us-attorneys-office-charged-202-people-firearms-crimes-last-year

Jan 9, 2018 ... Details of selected firearms cases from last year: U.S. v. Bowers et. al: Eleven people from Stark County were indicted for firearms violations, including firearms trafficking and an illegal sale of a machine gun. Andre Bowers, of Canton, was charged with illegally dealing a Harrington & Richardson .32-caliber ...

www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?entryID=4742

Dec 4, 2015 ... United States v. Miller et al. originated in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas, Fort Smith Division when a federal grand jury indicted two men for transporting a sawed-off shotgun from Oklahoma to Arkansas in violation of a federal firearm statute. The case eventually became the single ...