Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._United_States_District_Court

United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972), also known as the Keith case, was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that upheld, in a unanimous 8-0 ruling, the requirements of the Fourth Amendment in cases of domestic surveillance targeting a domestic threat. The United States charged John ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-1st-circuit/1590896.html

Jan 11, 2012 ... Case opinion for US 1st Circuit UNITED STATES v. ... Karen A. Pickett, with whom Donnelly, Conroy & Gelhaar, LLP was on brief, for appellant. .... United States v. Henry, 519 F.3d 68, 74 (1st Cir.2008). Curet does not raise any specific problems related to his predicate conviction on appeal and so the ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/399/149/case.html

In People v. Johnson, 68 Cal.2d 646, 441 P.2d 111 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1051 (1969), the California Supreme Court held that, prior statements of a witness that were not subject to cross-examination when originally made, could not be introduced under this section to prove the charges against a defendant without ...

law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/court-of-appeals/1980/80-113-cr-5.html

The special treatment urged by defendant and contained in Wis J I Criminal 320 has been disavowed in Gelhaar v. State, 41 Wis. 2d 230, 163 N.W.2d 609 (1969), cert. denied sub nom. Gelhaar v. Wisconsin, 399 U.S. 929 (1970). The Gelhaar court held that prior inconsistent statements are to be considered by the jury as ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/407/297

407 U.S. 297. United States v. United States District Court (No. 70-153). Argued: February 24, 1972. Decided: June 19, 1972. ___. Syllabus; Opinion, Powell; Concurrence, Douglas; Concurrence, White. Syllabus. The United States charged three defendants with conspiring to destroy, and one of them with destroying, ...

scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2445&context=mulr

Evidence: Gelhaar v. State: Prior Inconsistent. Statements. Herbert V. Adams. Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr ..... also DiCarlo v. United States, 6 F.2d 364 (2d Cir. 1925), cert. denied, 268. U.S. 706 (1925). 29 Annot., 133 A.L.R. 1454 (1941). See also Annot., 74 A.L.R. 1042 ...

media.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/13-1732P-01A.pdf

Dec 1, 2014 ... LINNETTE SUN;. UNITED STATES, EX REL. GREG HAMILTON,. Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION,. Defendant, Appellee. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. [Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge] ...

media.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/16-1304P-01A.pdf

Dec 16, 2016 ... Plaintiffs, v. CYBERONICS, INC.,. Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. [Hon. F. Dennis Saylor, IV, U.S. District Judge]. Before ... Timothy H. Madden, and Donnelly, Conroy & Gelhaar LLP were on brief, for appellee.

www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20151118a11

Nov 17, 2015 ... Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 , 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962). In determining whether to grant a motion to amend, the Court must examine the totality of the circumstances and "exercise its informed discretion in constructing a balance of pertinent considerations." Palmer v. Champion Mortg., 465 ...