Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_v._United_States

Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984), is a United States Supreme Court decision relating to the open fields doctrine limiting the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Contents. [hide]. 1 Background; 2 Opinion of the Court ; 3 See also; 4 Further reading; 5 External links. Background[edit]. Acting upon a  ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hester_v._United_States

Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57 (1924), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which established the open-fields doctrine. In an opinion written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, the Court held that "the special protection accorded by the Fourth Amendment to the people in their 'persons, houses, papers and ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/265/57/case.html

U.S. Supreme Court. Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57 (1924). Hester v. United States. No. 243. Submitted April 24, 1924. Decided May 5, 1924. 265 U.S. 57. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Syllabus. 1. In a prosecution for ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/466/170/case.html

Pp. 466 U. S. 176-184. Page 466 U. S. 171. (a) That doctrine was founded upon the explicit language of the Fourth Amendment, whose special protection accorded to "persons houses, papers, and effects" does "not exten[d] to the open fields." Hester v. United States, supra, at 265 U. S. 59. Open fields are not "effects " within ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1455300.html

Case opinion for US 8th Circuit UNITED STATES v. HESTER. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... While the cooks were manufacturing methamphetamine, Hester would scan police radios to detect police activity and watch for people coming onto the property with the aid of binoculars and night vision equipment.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-11th-circuit/1412269.html

Apr 11, 2002 ... Case opinion for US 11th Circuit UNITED STATES v. HESTER. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/466/170

Hester v. United States, supra, at 59. Open fields are not "effects" within the meaning of the Amendment, the term "effects" being less inclusive than "property, " and not ... Applying Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 357 (1967), the court found that petitioner had a reasonable expectation that the field would remain private ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/265/57

265 U.S. 57 (44 S.Ct. 445, 68 L.Ed. 898) ... The plaintiff in error, Hester, was convicted of concealing distilled spirits, etc., under Rev. ... is contended that this made their evidence inadmissible, it being assumed, on the strength of the pursuing officer's saying that he supposed they were on Hester's land, that such was the fact.

www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/16/16-1027/20975/20171120174452485_16-1027%20tsac.Cato.pdf

Nov 20, 2017 ... accorded to an individual's home has extended be- yond the house itself to the surrounding property, known as the “curtilage.” Indeed, this Court has rec- ognized that the practice of treating the curtilage as part of the home is “'as old as the common law.'” Jardines, 569 U.S. at 6 (quoting Hester v. United.