Web Results


United States v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., was a 2005 Third Circuit antitrust decision finding that Dentsply, a monopolist manufacturer-supplier, used its exclusive dealing policy to keep rival firms' sales "below the critical level necessary for any rival to pose a real threat to Dentsply's market share," in violation of Sherman Act § 2.


This case required the Oregon Supreme Court's interpretation of ORS 12.135(1)( a). ORS 12.135(1)(a) provided that an action arising from the “construction, alteration or repair of any improvement to real property” must be commenced within “[t]he applicable period of limitation otherwise established by law.” The question in ...


C and V international Marble | HomeAdvisor prescreened Tile Contractors in Woodbridge, VA. ... self-reported by the Service Professional. *HomeAdvisor verifies state-level licensing where applicable - note: some states require local or county level licensing and you should verify whether or not your pro is properly licensed.


Sep 6, 2007 ... Escorial contends the trial court erred by rejecting its nuisance cause of action. We disagree. In City of San Diego v. U.S. Gypsum Co. (1995) 30 Cal.App.4th 575 , 584, 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 876, we concluded that a city could not maintain a nuisance cause of action for asbestos contamination of its buildings.


Jul 1, 2009 ... Case opinion for US 7th Circuit TRUSTEES OF CHICAGO PLASTERING INSTITUTE PENSION TRUST v. ... Beginning in 1991, the Northern Illinois District Council of Operative Plasterers and Cement Masons' International Association ( the “OP Council”), a collective of union locals representing plasterers ...


Jun 25, 2003 ... United States v. Ferguson, 246 F.3d 129, 138 (2d Cir.2001). See also 28 U.S.C. § 1291. BACKGROUND. Schultz was a successful art dealer in New York .... Inc.; International Association of Professional Numismatists; The Art Dealers Association of America; The Antique Tribal Art Dealers Association; The ...


Andrew J. Dallstream, Chicago, Ill., Walter G. Moyle, Ralph P. Wanlass, Washington, D.C., Albert E. Hallett, Chicago, Ill., for appellee Celotex Corp. .... In United States v. Line Material Co., 333 U.S. 287, 68 S.Ct. 550, 92 L.Ed. 701, decided the same day as the Gypsum case, the opinion of the Court discussed the then ...


Jan 31, 2007 ... United States 31 January 2007 Federal District Court [Minnesota] (Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al. v. .... On August 3, 1998, Denver Drywall entered into a subcontract agreement with Big Horn Plastering, Inc. and Big Horn Plastering of Colorado, Inc. (collectively, "Big Horn"), both ...


Container Corp., 393 U.S. 333, 89 S.Ct. 510, 21 L.Ed.2d 526 (1969), would excuse what might otherwise constitute an antitrust violation. ..... On the contrary, the § 2(b) defense has been successfully invoked in the absence of in erseller verification on numerous occasions, see, e. g., International Air Industries, Inc. v.