Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicaragua_v._United_States

The United States refused to participate in the merits phase of the proceedings, but the Court found that the US refusal did not prevent it from deciding the case. The Court also rejected the United States defense that its action constituted collective self-defense. The United States ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lean_construction

US: Illinois Institute of Technology; U.C. Berkeley; Michigan State University; San Diego State University; Texas A & M; Washington State University; Virginia Tech; Arizona State University; Purdue University; Bowling Green University; North Carolina State University; University of Texas – Austin; University of Colorado ...

media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/14/12/133794P.pdf

Oct 9, 2014 ... United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Stacey Sellner lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. ______. Appeal from United States District .... See Koskela v. United States, 235 F.3d 1148,. 1149 (8th Cir. 2001) (holding that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing the petitioner's ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1380018.html

Aug 5, 2004 ... Case opinion for US 8th Circuit UNITED STATES v. PAYNE. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1097604.html

United States v. Koskela, 86 F.3d 122, 126 (8th Cir.1996). We will overturn a jury verdict only when no reasonable jury could have found the defendant guilty beyond ... Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 124, 94 S.Ct. 2887, 2911, 41 L. Ed.2d 590 (1974); Campbell, 848 F.2d at 851. Once the conspiracy is established , the ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1691492.html

Feb 4, 2015 ... Case opinion for US 8th Circuit UNITED STATES v. ... United States of America, Plaintiff–Appellee v. .... Id. Ex parte communications between judge and jury in the absence of and without notice to the defendant are “presumptively prejudicial. ” United States v. Koskela, 86 F.3d 122, 125 (8th Cir.1996).

cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca8/13-3221/13-3221-2015-02-04.pdf?ts=1423067463

Feb 4, 2015 ... United States v. Koskela, 86 F.3d. 122, 125 (8th Cir. 1996). Nevertheless, a "clear indication of an absence of prejudice" can overcome this presumption. Id. A defendant is not prejudiced by ex parte contacts between judge and jury that are merely ministerial in nature and not substantive communications.

law.justia.com/cases/michigan/court-of-appeals-published/2017/330183.html

Justia › US Law › Case Law › Michigan Case Law › Michigan Court of Appeals - Published Opinions Decisions › 2017 › FRANK KERN III V BONNIE KERN- KOSKELA. Receive free daily summaries of new Michigan Supreme Court opinions. Subscribe ...

mn.gov/law-library-stat/archive/supct/0412/opa040568-1223.htm

STATE OF MINNESOTA. IN SUPREME COURT. A04-568. Hennepin County. Page, J. Took no part, Anderson, G. Barry. Eric William Koskela, petitioner,. Appellant,. vs. Filed: December 23, 2004. Clerk of Appellate Courts. State of Minnesota,. Respondent. S Y L L A B U S. Appellant's claims are procedurally barred under ...