Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._United_States_District_Court

United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972), also known as the Keith case, was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that upheld, in a unanimous 8-0 ruling, the requirements of the Fourth Amendment in cases of domestic surveillance targeting a domestic threat. The United States charged John ...

law.justia.com/cases/new-york/other-courts/2002/2002-ny-slip-op-30145-u.html

Log In Sign Up. search. Find a Lawyer · Ask a Lawyer · Research the Law · Law Schools · Laws & Regs · Newsletters · Legal Marketing · Justia › US Law › Case Law › New York Case Law › New York Other Courts Decisions › 2002 › Siegel v Luk. Receive free daily summaries of new New York Court of Appeals opinions.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/407/297/case.html

Concerns about domestic security are not enough to allow law enforcement to use electronic surveillance without first getting a warrant, since this concept easily could be exploited to illegitimately spy on political opposition.

www.2harecourt.com/training-and-knowledge/hksar-v-luk-kin-peter-joseph-another-analysis

Zubair Ahmad examines in detail the recent Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal decision in HKSAR v Luk Kin Peter Joseph and Yu Oi Kee [FACC 6/2016] ... In October 2008, Mr Luk informed Mr Leung that United Easy Investments Limited (“ United Easy”) was interested in buying Cell Therapy for HK $15 million. The board of ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/407/297

407 U.S. 297. United States v. United States District Court (No. 70-153). Argued: February 24, 1972. Decided: June 19, 1972. ___. Syllabus; Opinion, Powell; Concurrence, Douglas; Concurrence, White. Syllabus. The United States charged three defendants with conspiring to destroy, and one of them with destroying, ...

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/11/04/13-30077.pdf

Nov 4, 2015 ... FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL ALLAN DREYER,. Defendant-Appellant. No. 13-30077. D.C. No. ...... 1988); United States v. Luk, 859 F.2d. 667, 671 (9th Cir. 1988)). As explained, the scenario presented by this case is both extreme and unusual.

masscases.com/cases/sjc/421/421mass415.html

Sep 11, 1995 ... North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717 (1969). [Note 8] It is the third protection that is at issue here. In order to show multiple punishments for double jeopardy purposes, a defendant must show the following three things: first, the administrative license suspension (ALS) imposed on her pursuant to c.

markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/r-bond-trader-faces-retrial-as-us-cracks-down-on-wall-street-abuses-2017-1-1001640580

Jan 3, 2017 ... By Jonathan Stempel. Jan 3 (Reuters) - A former Jefferies Group Inc bond trader is going back on trial in federal court in Connecticut over whether he lied to customers about mortgage bond prices to boost profit. The retrial of Jesse Litvak, with jury selection set for Wednesday and opening arguments for ...

www.twobirds.com/en/news/articles/2012/cross-border-litigation-after-gat-v-luk-and-roche-v-primus-the-future-of-the-italian-torpedo

Jan 1, 2009 ... Two years after the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered the two decisions GAT v LuK {Case C-4/03) and Roche v Primus {Case C-539/03) on 13 July 2006, the effect on cross-border litigation .... It is possible that this groundbreaking decision may show us how the torpedo will be treated in the future.