Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_v._M%27Intosh

Johnson v. M'Intosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that held that private citizens could not purchase lands from Native Americans. As the facts were recited by Chief Justice John Marshall, the successor in interest to a private purchase from the Piankeshaw attempted to ...

www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2016/08/19/mcintosh-decision-limits-doj-powers-but-medical-marijuana-advocates-should-worry

Aug 19, 2016 ... This week marijuana reform advocates applauded a federal appeals court decision limiting the power of the Department of Justice to prosecute certain marijuana growers. In United States v. McIntosh, the three judge panel (two Republican and one Democratic appointee) dealt explicitly with the ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/283/605/case.html

Macintosh, 283 U.S. 605 (1931). United States v. Macintosh. No. 504. Argued April 27, 1931. Decided May 25, 1931. 283 U.S. 605. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Syllabus. 1. A petition for naturalization presents a case for the exercise of the judicial power, to which the ...

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/08/16/15-10117.pdf

Aug 16, 2016 ... FOR PUBLICATION. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVE MCINTOSH,. Defendant-Appellant. No. 15-10117. D.C. No. 3:14-cr-00016-. MMC -3. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/283/605.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court US v. MACINTOSH. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1744520.html

Case opinion for US 9th Circuit US v. McIntosh. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1668663.html

Jun 4, 2014 ... Case opinion for US 2nd Circuit UNITED STATES v. McINTOSH. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2013/11/25/mcintoshmotdismiss.pdf

Nov 25, 2013 ... McIntosh's counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S.. 738 ( 1967). Because the United States agrees with appellant's counsel that there are no potentially meritorious issues, the United States has filed a notice stating that it does not intend to file a response brief. The agreement explained ...

www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/08/16/ninth-circuit-bars-federal-prosecutions-for-state-law-authorized-medical-marijuana

Aug 16, 2016 ... Today, the Ninth Circuit held (in United States v. McIntosh) that federal judges should enforce this law by stopping prosecutions for conduct that is authorized by state medical marijuana laws: Appellants complain that DOJ is spending funds that have not been appropriated by Congress in violation of the ...