Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._$124,700_in_U.S._Currency

United States of America v. $124,700 in U.S. Currency, 458 F.3d 822 (8th Cir. 2006), was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit that was handed down on August 18, 2006. The form of the styling of this case— the defendant being an object, rather than a legal person—is because this is a ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/461/555

U.S. Supreme Court. United States v. $8,850 in Currency, 461 U.S. 555 (1983). United States v. $8,850 in Currency. No. 81-1062. Argued January 18, 1983. Decided May 23, 1983. 461 U.S. 555. Syllabus. The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, 31 U.S.C. § 1101, requires persons knowingly transporting monetary instruments  ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/401/715/case.html

Having found that the money had been used in violation of those laws, the District Court ordered forfeiture under 26 U.S.C. § 7302. After the Court of Appeals affirmed, the case was remanded for further consideration in the light of this Court's subsequent decisions in Marchetti v. United States, 390 U. S. 39, and Grosso v.

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/461/555

461 U.S. 555 (103 S.Ct. 2005, 76 L.Ed.2d 143). UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. EIGHT THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($8,850) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY. No. 81-1062. Argued: Jan. 18, 1983. Decided: May 23, 1983. opinion, O'CONNOR [HTML]; dissent, STEVENS [HTML]. Syllabus.

openjurist.org/40/f3d/846/united-states-v-5000-in-us-currency-9750-us

40 F.3d 846. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. $5,000 IN U.S. CURRENCY and $9,750 in U.S. Currency, Defendants, Robert Walker and Thomas Harris, Parties in Interest-Appellants. No. 93-3851. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued Aug. 1, 1994. Decided Nov. 23, 1994. Kathleen L.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1864155.html

Jun 12, 2017 ... Case opinion for US 9th Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 167 070 00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/510/135.html

2 [ RATZLAF v. UNITED STATES, ___ U.S. ___ (1994) , 3]. Ratzlaf maintained on appeal that he could not be convicted of "willfully violating" the anti-structuring law solely on the basis of his knowledge that a financial institution must report currency transactions in excess of $10,000 and his intention to avoid such reporting.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1026030.html

Aug 18, 2006 ... UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. $124,700, IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendant/Appellee, Manuel Gomez; Andres Madrigal Morgan; Emiliano Gomez Gonzolez, Claimants/Appellees.

casetext.com/case/united-states-v-seventeen-thousand-nine-hundred-dollars-17900-in-us-currency

Aug 4, 2016 ... CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge. Sign Up For Free To Read More. Christopher Brodie Brown, Thomas P. Swanton, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.