Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safford_Unified_School_District_v._Redding

Safford Unified School District v. Redding, 557 U.S. 364 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a strip search of a middle schooler violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution where the school lacked reasons to suspect either that the drugs (Ibuprofen) presented a ...

www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-v-gillette-company-et-al

Jun 16, 2017 ... United States v. The Gillette Company, Wilkinson Sword, Inc., Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags AB and Eemland Management Services BV. Case Type: Civil Merger. Case Violation: Horizontal Merger. Industry Code: Cutlery. Cutlery and Flatware ( except Precious) Manufacturing. Razor Blades and Razors, ...

www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/14a0210p-06.pdf

Aug 27, 2014 ... UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LOVINA MILLER (13-3177) , KATHRYN MILLER (13-. 3181), EMMA MILLER (13-3182), ANNA MILLER ... 3207/ 3208/ 3214. United States v. Miller et al. Page 2. Ohio, for Appellant in 13- 3183. Wendi L. Overmyer, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC.

www.history.com/this-day-in-history/u-s-supreme-court-decides-paramount-antitrust-case

On this day in 1948, the U.S. Supreme Court issues a decision in U.S. v. Paramount Pictures, et al., the government's long-running antitrust lawsuit against Paramount Pictures and seven other major Hollywood movie studios. The forerunner of the case was a 1928 antitrust lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/341/412

341 U.S. 412 (71 S.Ct. 806, 95 L.Ed. 1062). RADIO CORP. OF AMERICA et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 565. Argued: March 26, 27, 1951. Decided: May 28, 1951. opinion, BLACK [HTML]. Syllabus from 413 intentionally omitted. John T. Cahill, New York City, for appellants Radio Corp. of America and others. Simon H .

www.law360.com/cases/582cb37b5270e848ba000001

Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case United States of America v. Energy Solutions, Inc. et al, case number 1:16-cv-01056, from Delaware Court.

www.italaw.com/cases/200

United States of America; Terminal Forest Products Ltd. v. United States of America, UNCITRAL (formerly Canfor Corporation v. United States of America; Tembec et al. v. United States of America; Terminal Forest Products Ltd. v. Case type: International Investment Agreement. Claimant(s):. Canfor Corporation, Terminal ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/462/640.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court ILLINOIS v. LAFAYETTE. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2476&context=journal_articles

L'excution des promesses en droit espagnol et en droit amojicam, in DE Tous HORIZONS. MtLANGES ..... 2000); In re Finley, Krumble et al., 130 E3d 52, 56 ( 2d Cir. .... 1982); Jeff-ies v. Sec'y of the IHS, 2004. U.S. Claims LEXIS 273, at *80. 38. E.g., State v. Griffin, 691 A.2d 556, 558 (R.I. 1997) ("Wielding Ockham's razor, we.