en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Apple_Inc.

United States v. Apple Inc., 952 F. Supp. 2d 638 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), was a US antitrust case in ... Apple Inc., et al.; The State of Texas, et al., v. Penguin Group Inc., et ...

www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-v-apple-inc-et-al

Mar 18, 2016 ... United States' Opposition to Apple Inc.'s Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Expert Testimony of Professor Richard Gilbert (Submitted: May 3, ...

www.nysd.uscourts.gov/cases/show.php?db=special&id=306

casetext.com/case/united-states-v-apple-inc-4

The United States Department of Justice (“DOJ” or “Justice Department”) and 33 states ... they argued, violated § 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. ... Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, 540 U.S. 398, 408, 124 S.Ct. 872, 157 ... all ebook prices to a cartel of book publishers—publishers who, with Apple's ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/apple-inc-v-united-states

Apple, Inc. v. United ... Dec 2 2015, Brief amici curiae of The Authors Guild, Inc., et al. filed. ... Dec 23 2015, Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.

casetext.com/case/united-states-v-apple-inc

Sep 5, 2012 ... Plaintiff the United States of America (the “Government”) brings this civil antitrust action against defendants Apple, .... Apple, et al., 77 Fed Reg.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1702133.html

Case opinion for US 2nd Circuit UNITED STATES v. ... APPLE INC ... of Delaware , State of Utah, State of North Dakota, State of Nebraska, State of Alabama, ...

qz.com/90143/us-v-apple-what-theyre-really-fighting-over-as-the-antitrust-case-goes-to-trial

Jun 2, 2013 ... Apple and the United States are due in a New York courtroom on Monday for the ... $14.99,” wrote Apple's then-CEO Steve Jobs to News Corp. executive James Murdoch. ... All five publishers that were sued by the US for their ...

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-204_bq7d.pdf

May 13, 2019 ... PEPPER ET AL. ... Apple Inc. sells iPhone applications, or apps, directly to iPhone ... UtiliCorp United Inc., 497 U. S. 199, 207, but has ruled.