Web Results

www.law360.com/articles/697235/daiichi-sankyo-shells-out-8-2m-in-sex-bias-settlement

Aug 31, 2015 ... The case is Wellens et al v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., case number 3:13-cv-0058, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20170201c65

Jan 31, 2017 ... Allen WILLIAMSON, D.O. and WIFE, Kathryn WILLIAMSON, D.O., Plaintiffs, v. DAIICHI SANKYO, Inc., et al., Defendants. United States District ...

sanfordheisler.com/case/daiichi-sankyo-gender-discrimination-class-action

Daiichi Sankyo Gender Pay, Promotion and Pregnancy Discrimination Class ... under the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., the first in the Ninth Circuit.

www.daiichisankyo.com/media_investors/media_relations/press_releases/detail/006680.html

Aug 2, 2017 ... “Daiichi Sankyo is committed to the health and safety of all patients ... Sankyo, Inc . “We believe a settlement is in the best interest of all, and will ...

www.justice.gov/opa/pr/daiichi-sankyo-inc-agrees-pay-39-million-settle-kickback-allegations-under-false-claims-act

Jan 9, 2015 ... Daiichi Sankyo Inc., a global pharmaceutical company with its U.S. headquarters in New Jersey, has agreed to pay the United States and state ...

www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs/public/EE-CA-0349-0001.pdf

23 2000(e)-5(f), et seq., as amended ("Title VII"); the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S. C. Section 201,. 24 et seq. ... Plaintiff Sara Wellens ("Ms. Wellens") is a woman who, at all times ... Defendant Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. is a pharmaceutical company that.

www.workplaceclassaction.com/class-discovery

Apr 17, 2014 ... Daiichi Sankyo Inc. consists of female pharmaceutical sales ... A recent decision from Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV in Chen-Oster, et al., v. ...... class action trial verdict ever – the $250 million verdict in Velez, et al. v.

hr.cch.com/ELD/QualcommIncSettlement.pdf

Jul 26, 2016 ... 2010) ............... 34. Velez v. Novartis Pharm. Corp., No. 04 Civ. 09194 (CM),. 2010 U.S. Dist. ...... received and read the Class Notice in Pan et al. v. Qualcomm ...... et al. v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Northern District of California.