Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apodaca_v._Oregon

Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that state juries may convict a defendant by less than unanimity even though federal law required that federal juries must reach criminal verdicts unanimously. The four-justice plurality opinion of the court, written by ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiggins_v._Smith

Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003) is a case in which the United States Supreme Court spelled out standards for "effectiveness" in the constitutional right to legal counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Previously the court had determined that the Sixth Amendment included the right to "effective assistance" of legal ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burch_v._Louisiana

Burch v. Louisiana, 441 U.S. 130 (1979), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that invalidated a Louisiana statute allowing a conviction upon a nonunanimous verdict from a jury of six for a petty offense. The statute allowed for conviction if only five jurors agreed, and this was held to be a violation of the ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1344389.html

Hamilton v. Schriro, 863 F.Supp. 1019, 1024 (W.D.Mo.1994). The district court held that “[a]lthough safety, security and cost concerns may be shown to be ... See Brown-El v. Harris, 26 F.3d 68, 69 (8th Cir.1994). Therefore, Hamilton's section 1983 action now encompasses two separate theories: (1) deprivation of his ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_v._Alabama

In Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932) the United States Supreme Court reversed the convictions of nine young black men for allegedly raping two white women on a freight train near Scottsboro, Alabama. The majority of the Court reasoned that the right to retain and be represented by a lawyer was fundamental to a fair ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/550/465

SCHRIRO, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. LANDRIGAN aka HILL. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. No. 05–1575. Argued January 9, 2007—Decided May 14, 2007. Respondent Landrigan refused to allow his counsel to present the testimony of his ex-wife and ...

www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022211zor.pdf

Feb 22, 2011 ... OPARAJI, MAURICE V. ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE, ET AL. The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 15,. 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule. 38( a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheff_v._Schnackenberg

Cheff v. Schnackenberg, 384 U.S. 373 (1966), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that crimes carrying possible penalties up to six months imprisonment do not require a jury trial if they otherwise qualify as petty offenses.

www.immigrantjustice.org/sites/default/files/Jimenez%20et%20al%20v%20Napolitano%20et%20al%20FINAL%20COMPLAINT.pdf

Aug 11, 2011 ... v. JANET NAPOLITANO, SECRETARY OF THE. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS);. JOHN MORTON, DIRECTOR OF U.S. ... Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and Bond v. United States, .... See ICE, Dr. Dora Schriro, Special Advisor to Secretary Napolitano on ICE/DRO,.