Web Results


Oct 10, 1991 ... Hill, Genson, Even, Crandall & Wade, Eugene M. Genson and Edwin B. Brown for Cross-defendant and Respondent. OPINION. YEGAN, J. Richard Visueta and Michael Bunt appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of General Motors Corporation (GMC). The trial court found that no triable facts ...


Childers v. General Motors Company LLC. Filed: April 16, 2018 as 2: 2016cv14428. Court: Michigan Eastern District Court Defendant: General Motors ... Defendant: General Motors LLC, General Motors Corporation, Chevrolet Division of General Motors, Motors Liquidation Company Plaintiff: .... Plaintiff: Maxine Renee Wade


Facts. The Plaintiff sued the Defendant and a division of the corporation for alleged personal injuries suffered by the Plaintiff. Plaintiff maintained such injuries were proximately caused by the Defendant's negligence in manufacturing and designing a front end loader which was sold to Plaintiff's employer. Defendant refused ...


Campbell v. General Motors Corp. , 32 Cal.3d 112. [S.F. No. 24308. Supreme Court of California. August 19, 1982.] FLORENCE L. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent. (Opinion by Bird, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) [32 Cal.3d 113].


Prior to trial, General Motors filed two motions in limine, in which it asked the trial court to exclude all references to a recall campaign which targeted 1988 and 1989 ... at which testimony was presented by appellant, General Motors Senior Staff Analysis Engineer Walter Zych, and Professional Engineer Wade E. Troyer.


Daly v. General Motors Corp. , 20 Cal.3d 725. [L.A. No. 30687. Supreme Court of California. March 16, 1978.] MICHAEL SEAN DALY, a Minor, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. In bank. (Opinion by Richardson, J., with Tobriner, Clark and ...


In the spring of 1942 the Secretary of War requested the Attorney General to institute proceedings for condemnation of the occupancy of the remaining space for a term ending June 30, 1943. Pursuant to the request, the United States, June 8, 1942, filed a petition in the District Court for an order condemning such temporary ...


1976); Haney v. Interna- tional Harvester Co., 294 Minn. 375, 201 N.W.2d 140 ( 1972); General Motors Corp. v. Hopkins,. 548 S.W.2d 344 (Tex. 1977). The following .... See Wade, Strict Tort Liability of Manufacturers, 19 Sw. L.J. 5, 11 ( 1965). 19. ... Moreover, it has long been recognized in scholarly commentary, see Wade,.


Aug 17, 2007 ... INTRODUCTION. Before the Court is Defendants General Motors Corp.; Toyota Motor North America, Inc.;. Ford Motor Co., American; Honda Motor Co., Inc; Daimler Chrysler Corp.; and Nissan North. America, Inc.'s (collectively, “ Defendants” or “Automakers”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of. Subject Matter ...