Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veoh

Veoh is an Internet television company based in San Diego, California. It allows users to find and watch major studio content, independent productions and user- generated material. The company is a subsidiary of Israeli start-up Qlipso. The company received media attention after Michael Eisner, a former Disney chairman, ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca11/2005

Erica Tyne, Individually and on Behalf of Frank William "billy" Tyne, Jr., Billie-jo Francis Tyne, Individually and on Behalf of Frank William "billy" Tyne, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.p., D.b.a. Warner Bros. Picture, Baltimore/spring Creek Pictures, L.l.c., a Delaware Limited Liability  ...

assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2429288/marya-v-warner-chappell.pdf

fairuse.stanford.edu/case/warner-bros-entertainment-inc-et-al-v-x-one-x-productions-et-al

Jul 6, 2011 ... Appellants (AVELA) appealed a permanent injunction prohibiting them from licensing certain images extracted from publicity materials for the films "Gone with the Wind" and "The Wizard of Oz," as well as several animated short films featuring the cat-mouse duo "Tom & Jerry." At issue was whether the ...

www.law360.com/cases/555db43e57d2c957b5000336/articles

Coverage of federal case Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc, et al v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited, et al, case number 15-2236, from Appellate - 3rd Circuit Court.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1178047.html

Aug 9, 2007 ... Case opinion for US 2nd Circuit TIME WARNER CABLE INC v. DIRECTV INC. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... On December 7, 2006, TWC filed this action charging DIRECTV with, inter alia, false advertising in violation of § 43 (a) of the Lanham Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1114, et seq. Initial negotiations ...

www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/s15-1080.Opinion.9-9-2016.2.pdf

Sep 13, 2016 ... MCRO, INC. v. BANDAI NAMCO GAMES AMERICA. 3. Company Ltd. LLC, Warner Bros. Interactive Entertain- ment, a Division of Warner Bros. Home Entertainment. Inc. BASIL TRENT WEBB, Shook, Hardy ..... U.S.A., et al., CV-13- 1870; McRO, Inc. v. Sucker Punch. Prod.s, LLC, CV-14-0332; McRO, Inc. v.

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012160698991497/pdf?md5=6770447a4ffa916dd73af117d1edda89&pid=1-s2.0-S0012160698991497-main.pdf&_valck=1

homologue, in this patterning process is less clear. Ectopic expression of dpp can cause either a gain or loss of macro- chaetes (Mullor et al., 1997). dpp expression is restricted to cells just anterior to the anteroposterior compartment bor- der, but extends into the presumptive notum of the wing disc where the dpp- expressing ...

seekingalpha.com/article/4127238-u-s-v-t-inc-time-warner-inc

Nov 22, 2017 ... The civil suit was filed by the Antitrust Division citing vertical merger violation. The vertical merger violation is interesting because recent Antitrust suits (2016 - 2017 ) generally have cited horizontal mergers rather than vertical mergers. A recent exception was the U.S. v. Charter Communications Inc., et. al.