Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Washington

United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), commonly known as the Boldt Decision was a 1974 case heard in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. It reaffirmed the reserved ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/washington-v-united-states

Issues: (1) Whether a treaty “right of taking fish, at all usual and accustomed grounds and stations ... in common with all citizens” guaranteed “that the number of fish would always be sufficient to provide a 'moderate living' to the tribes”; (2) whether the district court erred in dismissing the state's equitable defenses against the ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/460/536

Washington v. United States. No. 81-969. Argued January 10, 1983. Decided March 29, 1983. 460 U.S. 536. Syllabus. Washington state statutes impose a sales tax on federal contractors with respect to the sale of materials to such contractors for work on federal projects, but with regard to nonfederal construction projects, ...

www.justice.gov/enrd/us-v-washington

Sep 11, 2017 ... In 1989, as part of the Court's continuing jurisdiction in United States v. Washington, the western Washington treaty tribes filed a proceeding (in which the United States joined) to establish that the treaty right to “fish” included all of the various species of shellfish. The Ninth Circuit held that the reserved right ...

elawreview.org/case-summaries/united-states-v-washington

In a supplemental proceeding to Judge Boldt's opinion in United States v. Washington (Boldt Decision),[1] as part of the ongoing litigation over Indian fishing rights in the Pacific Northwest, the Ninth Circuit held that fish caught by the Chehalis Indian Tribe would be attributed to Washington's share of the harvest rather than ...

www.uscourts.gov/cameras-courts/state-washington-vs-donald-j-trump-et-al

Feb 3, 2017 ... Case Summary: 17-CV-00141-JLR The State of Washington (State) filed this action challenging the President's Executive Order on immigration of January 27, 2017. The State seeks a finding that certain sections of the Executive Order are contrary to the Constitution and laws of the United States, and ...

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/06/27/13-35474.pdf

Jun 27, 2016 ... UNITED STATES V. WASHINGTON. 3. SUMMARY**. Tribal Fishing Rights. The panel affirmed the district court's order issuing an injunction directing the State of Washington to correct culverts, which allow streams to flow underneath roads, because they violated, and continued to violate, the Stevens.

www.oyez.org/cases/1996/96-110

Dr. Harold Glucksberg -- along with four other physicians, three terminally ill patients who have since died, and a nonprofit organization that counsels individuals contemplating physician assisted-suicide -- brought this suit challenging the state of Washington's ban on physician assisted-suicide. The State of Washington has ...

scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3016&context=wmlr

accused was exempted from punishment only in cases of extreme in- sanity involving a total loss of understanding, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia supplemented this rule of insanity with the. 1. Washington v. United States, 390 F. 2d 444 (D.C. Cir. 1967). 2. Id. at 456. 3. Durham v. United States, 214 F.