Web Results

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/stryker-corp-v-zimmer-inc

Jul 24 2015, Brief of respondents Zimmer, Inc., and Zimmer Surgical, Inc. in opposition filed. Jul 24 2015, Brief amici curiae of Independent Inventor Groups filed. (Distributed). Jul 24 2015, Brief amicus curiae of Nokia Technologies OY, and Nokia USA Inc. filed. Aug 6 2015, Reply of petitioners Stryker Corporation, et al. filed.

www.waterskraus.com/why-wkp/our-results

Our Results. Read the case summaries. Click on the links below to review the facts of some of our results. Ross, et al v. A.O. Smith Corporation, et al · Sylvestre v. New England Insulation Company · Eastridge, et al v. Cleaver-Brooks, et al · Hood, v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours · Kline, et. al. v. Zimmer, Inc., et al. Golik, et. al. v.

patentlyo.com/media/2016/09/13-1668.Opinion.9-7-2016.1.pdf

Sep 12, 2016 ... Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and HUGHES, Circuit. Judges. PROST, Chief Judge. This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme. Court of the United States. Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse. Elecs., Inc., 136 S. Ct. 1923 (2016). In the original appeal,. Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Surgical, Inc., and Zimmer ...

e-foia.uspto.gov/Foia/RetrievePdf?system=FCA&flNm=15-1232_1

May 12, 2016 ... (“Wright”); and Zimmer, Inc. (“Zimmer”) (collectively. “Zimmer et al.”) did not infringe the asserted claims of. U.S. Patent No. 6,475,243 (“'243 patent”).2. The district court granted summary judgment of non- infringement following claim construction. On appeal,. Stryker contends that the district court erred in its ...

dockets.justia.com/browse/state-missouri/court-moedce

Nattier et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al. Filed: February 21, 2018 as 4:2018cv00300. Plaintiff: Jean Nattier, William Nattier. Defendant: Zimmer, Inc. , Zimmer US, Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and others. Cause Of Action: Diversity-Petition for Removal . Court: Eighth Circuit › Missouri › Missouri Eastern District Court. Type: Torts - Injury ...

www.mckoolsmith.com/newsroom-publications-202

Rapid Litigation Management Ltd. v. CellzDirect, Inc. Amgen Inc. v. Apotex, Inc. The Medicines Company v. Hospira, Inc. Skyhawke Technologies, LLC v. Deca International Corporation; WBIP, LLC v. Kohler Co. Polar Electro Oy v. Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor, et al. Unwired Planet, LLC v. Apple Inc. In re: Magnum Oil ...

www.legalmetric.com/samples/fedcircuit_damages_excerpt.pdf

Inc., et al. v. Maxcess. Techno. Damages. Lost Profits. Affirmed. Jury. Verdict/JM. OL. Lourie, Michel,. Schall. 99-1347. Tate Access Floors,. Inc., et al. v. Maxcess ..... Inc. v. Waters Corp. Damages. Lost Profits. Vacated,. Remanded. Bench Trial. Linn, Prost. 08-1029. Cohesive Tech. Inc. v. Waters Corp. Damages. Enhanced.

ps.zimmerbiomet.com/wps/wcm/connect/ps/253d1dba-8073-4c7a-95ef-b8d9ee1e5c76/Line+23+Zimmer+Personalized+Solutions+Group+All-inclusive+Brochure+FINAL+3.24.15.pdf?MOD=AJPERES

References: 1. JW Noble, Jr. MD, et al. The Value of Patient-matched Instrumentation in TKA, Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2012 2. TS Watters , MD, et al. Analysis of Procedure-related Costs and proposed Benefits of Using Patient-specific Approach in TKA, Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances, Vol. 20, No.

www.analysisgroup.com/uploadedfiles/content/experts_and_staff/principals/vigil_cv.pdf

Essilor International, et al. U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia (Case No . 3:16-CV-563-JAG). Patent Infringement: expert report regarding reasonable royalty damages involving patent related to backside progressive lenses with correction for eye astigmatism. ▫ Heraeus Medical GmbH v. Esschem, Inc. U.S. District ...