Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pfizer_Inc._v._Government_of_India

Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India, 434 U.S. 308 (1978) decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that foreign states are entitled to sue for treble damages in U.S. courts, and should be recognized as "persons" under the Clayton Act.

www.law360.com/cases/53c59fb78074bd3ed1000001

Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case American Sales Company, LLC v. Pfizer, Inc. et al, case number 2:14-cv-00361, from Virginia Eastern Court.

www.wvscblog.com/opinion-analysis/m-m-v-pfizer-inc-et-al

Nov 16, 2017 ... The petitioner, M.M., an infant, by her mother, is one of nineteen minor plaintiffs who alleged that they sustained birth defects from their mother's use of the prescription anti-depressant Zoloft. The respondent, Pfizer, manufactures and markets Zoloft. The remaining respondents, Roerig and Greenhouse, are ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/17-2056/17-2056-2018-01-19.html

Jan 19, 2018 ... Levine, the Supreme Court held that claims against a manufacturer of a brand- name prescription drug for failure to warn adequately of the drug's dangers were not preempted by federal law.; in PLIVA v. Mensing, the Court held that such failure-to-warn claims against manufacturers of generic drugs are ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/ct-supreme-court/1211897.html

Supreme Court of Connecticut. Thomas POULOS v. PFIZER, INC., et al. No. 15676. Decided: April 28, 1998. Before CALLAHAN, C.J., and BORDEN, NORCOTT, McDONALD and PETERS, JJ.William C. Longa, with whom was Patrick J. Fitzgerald, Woodbridge, for appellant (named defendant). Thomas J. Riley, with whom ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/922/1261/1592845

922 F. Supp. 1261 (1996). Arthur Ray BOWLING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PFIZER, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C-1-91-256. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. March 1, 1996. *1262 Stanley Morris Chesley, Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley Co. 1, Cincinnati, OH, for Arthur Ray Bowling, Julie Whyle, Janet ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1211311.html

Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, California. James CLAYWORTH, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PFIZER, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. A116798. Decided: July 25, 2008. Alioto Law Firm, Joseph M. Alioto, Theresa D. Moore, Angelina Alioto-Grace, Joseph M. Alioto, Jr., Thomas P. Pier, San ...

scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/clayworth-v-pfizer-33875

Jul 12, 2010 ... IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES CLAYWORTH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, S166435 v. Ct.App. 1/2 A116798 PFIZER, INC., et al., ..... 493; Kansas v. UtiliCorp United Inc. (1990) 497 U.S. 199, 224 (dis. opn. of White, J.); B.W.I. Custom Kitchen v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., supra, 191. Cal.

www.finnegan.com/files/Publication/48de9f25-b22f-4d07-9c56-151fa117073b/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/67b8c48d-5c6b-48ef-b29d-160d7303d9fa/12-1576%202-6-14.pdf

Feb 6, 2014 ... DIMITRIOS T. DRIVAS, White & Case LLP, of New. York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellees Pfizer. Page 3. PFIZER INC. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. 3. Inc., et al. With him on the brief were JEFFREY J. OELKE,. ADAM GAHTAN, BRENDAN G. WOODARD, ROBERT E. COUNIHAN, and ...