Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brushaber_v._Union_Pacific_Railroad_Co.

Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the validity of a tax statute called the Revenue Act of 1913, also known as the Tariff Act, Ch. 16, 38 Stat. 166 (October 3, 1913), enacted pursuant to Article I, section 8, clause 1 of, and the ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1870913.html

Aug 15, 2017 ... Case opinion for US 8th Circuit WHITE v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/240/1.html

Mr. Chief Justic e White delivered the opinion of the court: As a stockholder of the Union Pacific Railroad Company, the appellant filed his bill to enjoin the corporation from complying with the income tax provisions of the tariff act of October 3, 1913 ( II., chap. 16, 38 Stat. at L. 166). Because of constitutional questions duly ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/141/250/case.html

The original action was by Clara L. Botsford against the union Pacific Railway Company for negligence in the construction and care of an upper berth in a ..... Railway, 47 Ia. 375; Miami &c. Turnpike Co. v. Baily, 37 Ohio St. 104; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Thul, 29 Kan. 466; White v. Milwaukee Railway, 61 Wis.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/240/1/case.html

Brushaber v. Union Pacific R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916). Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. No. 140. Argued October 14, 15, 1915. Decided January 24, 1916. 240 U.S. 1. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT ... CHIEF JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. As a stockholder of the Union Pacific Railroad  ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/91/72

U.S. Supreme Court. United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 91 U.S. 72 (1875). United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. 91 U.S. 72. Syllabus. 1. The solution of the question whether the Union Pacific Railroad Company is required to pay the interest before the maturity of the principal of the bonds issued ...

famguardian1.org/Subjects/Taxes/CourtCases/BrushaberVUnionPacRR240US1.htm

Mar 14, 2010 ... Mr. Brushaber filed suit in federal District Court in New York to enjoin the Union Pacific Railroad from volunteering to pay federal income tax on its ... In the Brushaber case, it would appear that Justice White's method for reversing the damage done by the Pollock decision was to obfuscate the issues by ...

www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Brushaber%20v.%20Union%20Pacific%20Railroad&item_type=topic

Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the validity of a tax statute called .... 1990); Perkins v. Commissioner, 746 F.2d 1187, 84-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) paragr. 9898 (6th Cir. 1984); White v. United States, 2005-1 U.S. Tax Cas.

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/civil-procedure/civil-procedure-keyed-to-yeazell/resolution-without-trial/sanders-v-union-pacific-railroad-co

Facts. In June 1995, the Plaintiff sued his employer, the Defendant, under the Federal Employer's Liability Act, following a work-related injury. The district judge set a trial date of November 19, 1996. He also issued a form order concerning preparation for a pretrial conference to be held on November 8, 1996, which set forth ...