Web Results

www.courtnewsohio.gov/cases/2016/SCO/1227/150348.asp

Dec 27, 2016 ... DiPietro took control of the pursuit and intended to direct officers to get in front of Barnhart and deploy “Stop Sticks” to catch him. DiPietro ... Sheriff Sergeant Adkins heard the radio call of the burglary and the attempt to capture Barnhart. ... The court cited the Second District Court of Appeals' 2006 Whitfield v.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca8/2003

Free Database of 2003 US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Case Law, Court Opinions & Decisions from Justia.

www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2016/2016-Ohio-8374.pdf

Dec 27, 2016 ... [Cite as Argabrite v. Neer, 149 Ohio St.3d 349, 2016-Ohio-8374.] Tort—R.C. 2744.03(A)(6)(b)—Immunity of employees of political subdivisions—. Willful, wanton ... Barnhart—that ended when Barnhart's vehicle struck Argabrite's vehicle head-on, ... support of that argument, they cited Whitfield v. Dayton ...

jpp.whs.mil/Public/docs/RFI/Set_1/Encl13-25/RFI_Enclosure_Q18e_USAF.pdf

Feb 22, 2013 ... United States v. Denedo, 556 U.S. 904, 911 (2009). A writ petition may be “in aid of” this Court's statutory jurisdiction even though it addresses an interlocutory ...... Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co., Inc. 534 U.S. 438,. 457 (2002). Floor statements may “open the door to the inadvertent, or perhaps even planned,.

www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/16-309-respondent-merits.pdf

That Proof Of Materiality Is Not Required. Because “the statutory language provides a clear answer” to the question of whether proof of materiali- ty is required to violate Section 1425(a), the construc- tion of the statute “ends there.” Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Jacobson, 525 U.S. 432, 438 (1999); see Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.

www.oyez.org/court/15238/rehnquist10

Rubin v. Coors Brewing Company. a case in which the Court held that for the government to regulate commercial speech, the government must have a ...... Gisbrecht v. Barnhart. Do lodestar fee awards for attorneys who successfully represent Social Security benefits claimants in court, under 42 USC section 406( b), displace ...

media.ca8.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/getAutDiss.pl?last_name=Riley&first_name=William&flag=aut

[ 01-1220 ] United States v. Michael T. Petersen. [ 01-1459 ] Steven C. Emery v. Roger Hunt. [ 01-1537 ] Joseph Whitfield v. Michael Bowersox .... [ 02-2362 ] Kelvin Lampkins v. Robert Thompson. [ 02-2502 ] American River Trans v. Paragon Marine Serv. [ 02-2506 ] Debbie Patrick v. Jo Ann B. Barnhart. [ 02-2565 ] Waelder Oil ...

www.plano.gov/DocumentCenter/View/2065

AGUILAR, MARGIE V. SCOTSWOOD DR. $1,535.20. 4. E176229V. AGUILAR, MELISSA. DIXON. $633.10. 2. 471308V. AGUILAR, MICHELLE REENA. WALWORTH. $3,815.10. 7. 459333. AGUILAR, OFELIA. DANBURY. $964.20. 3. E216110V. AGUILAR, SERGIO SAAVEDRA. WEBB CHAPEL. $1,064.10. 3. E130976V.

www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/mfa/2016/2016_Case-Summaries-and-Index-20160411_r.pdf

Apr 11, 2016 ... Cohen. England & Whitfield(1991) 231 Cal. App.3d 692. Woods v. ... Skarbrevik v . Cohen, England & Whitfield. Representation ... Pollack v. Lytle. Fixed Fees. Hawk v. State Bar. Gross v. Net Recovery. Ramirez v.Sturdevant. Lodestar. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart. Emplam, LLC v. Teitler Family Trust. Modifications.