Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Miller

United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), was a Supreme Court case that involved a Second Amendment challenge to the National Firearms Act of 1934 ( NFA). Miller is often cited in the ongoing American gun politics debate, as both sides claim that it supports their position.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/307/174/case.html

Only weapons that have a reasonable relationship to the effectiveness of a well- regulated militia under the Second Amendment are free from government regulation.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/425/435

United States v. Miller. No. 74-1179. Argued January 12, 1976. Decided April 21, 1976. 425 U.S. 435. Syllabus. Respondent, who had been charged with various federal offenses, made a pretrial motion to suppress microfilms of checks, deposit slips, and other records relating to his accounts at two banks, which maintained ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174

307 U.S. 174. United States v. Miller (No. 696). Argued: March 30, 1939. Decided : May 15, 1939. 26 F.Supp. 1002, reversed. Syllabus; Opinion, Mcreynolds. Syllabus. The National Firearms Act, as applied to one indicted for transporting in interstate commerce a 12-gauge shotgun with a barrel less than 18 inches long ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/317/369

317 U.S. 369 (63 S.Ct. 276, 87 L.Ed. 336). UNITED STATES v. MILLER et al. No. 78. Argued: Nov. 16, 17, 1942. Decided: Jan. 4, 1943. opinion, ROBERTS [HTML] . See 318 U.S. 798, 63 S.Ct. 557, 87 L.Ed. —-. Mr. Norman M. Littell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner. Mr. Laurence J. Kennedy, of Redding, Cal., for respondents.

www.leagle.com/decision/1978934569sw2d3651882

Eduardo CARMELO, Appellant, v. ... Jack L. Koehr, City Counselor, John J. Fitzgibbon, Associate City Counselor, St. Louis, for Delbert Miller, Jr., et al. ... the decision as to what he should do as a police officer, the employer is not liable for the acts of the police officer. Kidder v. Whitley, 336 Mass. 307 , 145 N.E.2d 684 ( 1957).

openjurist.org/743/f2d/1372/albers-v-whitley

Whitley. 743 F.2d 1372. Gerald ALBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold WHITLEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 82-3551. United States Court of Appeals, .... See Haygood v. Younger, 718 F.2d 1472, 1482-83 (9th Cir.1983), petition for rehearing en banc granted, 729 F.2d 613 (9th Cir.1984); Miller v. Solem, 728 F. 2d ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1723469.html

Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 7, California. STATE of California EX REL. Robert G. BARTLETT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Gene MILLER et al., Defendants and Respondents. B259472. Decided: January 19, 2016. Howarth & Smith, Don Howarth, Suzelle M. Smith, Jessica L. Rankin; Berney Law Corporation and ...