Web Results


MILLER v. MILLER - 1998 OK 24, 69OBJ1172, 956 P.2d 887. ... For this fraud, Jimmy seeks damages against all defendants, including an amount equal to the sum of the court-ordered [956 P.2d 893] child support payments made since 1985, plus ..... 12The provisions of 10 O.S. 1991 §§1 et seq. were amended in 1994.


OCTOBER TERM, 1993. Syllabus. AMERICAN DREDGING CO. v. MILLER. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 91-1950. Argued November 9, 1993-Decided February 23,1994. After respondent was injured while working as a seaman on a tug operating on the Delaware River and owned by ...


Second, it is most unlikely ever to produce uniform results, since the doctrine vests great discretion in the trial court, see, e. g., Piper Aircraft Co. v. ... Merchants & Miners Transp. Co. ... "(1) Any civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all other remedies to which they are otherwise entitled.".


Dec 4, 2015 ... United States v. Miller et al. originated in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas, Fort Smith Division when a federal grand jury indicted two men for transporting a sawed-off shotgun from Oklahoma to Arkansas in violation of a federal firearm statute. The case eventually became the single ...


Jack L. Koehr, City Counselor, John J. Fitzgibbon, Associate City Counselor, St. Louis, for Delbert Miller, Jr., et al. ... facts to the officer and leaves to him the decision as to what he should do as a police officer, the employer is not liable for the acts of the police officer. Kidder v. Whitley, 336 Mass. 307 , 145 N.E.2d 684 ( 1957).


307 U.S. 174. United States v. Miller (No. 696). Argued: March 30, 1939. Decided : May 15, 1939. 26 F.Supp. 1002, reversed. Syllabus; Opinion, Mcreynolds. Syllabus ... These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. "A body of citizens enrolled ...


317 U.S. 369 (63 S.Ct. 276, 87 L.Ed. 336). UNITED STATES v. MILLER et al. No. 78. Argued: Nov. 16, 17, 1942. Decided: Jan. 4, 1943. opinion, ROBERTS [HTML] . See 318 U.S. 798, 63 S.Ct. 557, 87 L.Ed. —-. Mr. Norman M. Littell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner. Mr. Laurence J. Kennedy, of Redding, Cal., for respondents.


Supreme Court of Virginia. Angela D. WHITLEY v. Thomas L. CHAMOURIS, Jr. Record No. 020338. Decided: January 10, 2003. Present: All the Justices.Steven S. Biss, Richmond, for appellant. Richard Tyler McGrath (Robert E. Kane, Jr.; William L. Jeffries, Jr.; Kane, Jeffries, Gayle, McGrath & Cooper, on brief), for appellee.


Robert Miller, a Mississippi resident who had moved north to find work, was injured while working as a seaman for American Dredging Company, ... (beyond the rudimentary elements of procedural fairness) is assuredly not what the law of admiralty seeks to achieve, since it is supposed to apply in all the courts of the world.