Web Results


RESCUE ARMY et al. v. ... But the attack upon the city ordinances in the Gospel Army case covered a much wider ..... But under the rule of Bandini Petroleum Co. v. ... Timken-Detroit Axle Co. and the Hatch Act case decided this term, this Court has followed a ..... 449, 464, 7 L.Ed. 481; Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Cotton Co. v.


MARTIN—ALEXANDER LUMBER COMPANY et al., Appts., v. .... The court of appeals found that the Detroit Company was a purchaser in good faith from the Martin-Alexander ..... 1030; Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. Rust ..... BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MONROE-WOODBURY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner v.


Jun 23, 2005 ... Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME .... No. 04–108. SUSETTE KELO, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CITY OF. NEW LONDON ..... 10 See, e.g., Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Cotton Duck Co. v. Alabama Inter-.


Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case City of Detroit, ... after a deadline for objections expired. 123 other articles on this case. View all » .... Audrey V. Bellamy ...... Hyde Park Co-Operative, et al. ...... Cranston Woodberry ...


Document Name: Certificate of Service of Edith Woodberry re: 1) Statement of ... Document Name: Order Granting the City of Detroit's Motion for the Entry of An ...


Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Cotton Duck Co. v. Alabama. Interstate Power Co., 240 U.S. ... City of Detroit, ..... Chapter 132, C.G.S. § 8-186, et seq., Municipal Develop -.


Case opinion for US Supreme Court KELO v. ... CITY OF NEW LONDON et al., ( 2005) ... SUSETTE KELO, et al., PETITIONERS v. ...... Boston & Maine Corp., 503 U. S. 407 (1992); Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Cotton Duck Co. v. .... Detroit, 410 Mich.


Case opinion for US 6th Circuit IN RE: CITY OF DETROIT. Read the ... v. CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, et al., Appellees. .... See Nordhoff Investments, Inc. v.


Nov 14, 2016 ... The City of Detroit filed for chapter 9 bankruptcy protection in July 2013. See In ... plans. All plaintiffs find the cost of DWSD's water service to be unaffordable. ... In Count V, they alleged estoppel, on the ground that customers.