Web Results


X One, Inc. Delivering a new class of service. Decades of communications experience in engineering, marketing, sales and corporate management. Identifying New Opportunities in Business and Technology; Creating New Products and Services; Experienced and Informed; Developing Cost Saving Solutions; Solving ...


Learn about working at X One, Inc.. Join LinkedIn today for free. See who you know at X One, Inc., leverage your professional network, and get hired.


Increase Printing Capabilities with the Innovent+. NORTH HUNTINGDON, Pa., September 20, 2017 – The ExOne Company (NASDAQ:XONE) (“ExOne”), a global provider of three-dimensional (“3D”) printing machines and 3D printed products to industrial customers,... Read More > ...


Oct 19, 2016 ... Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case X One, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., case number 3:16-cv-06050, from California Northern Court.


X One, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. 5:16-cv-06050; Filed: 10/19/2016; Case Updated Daily; Latest Docket Entry: 01/29/2018; PACER. Thank you for your request. You will receive a custom alert email when the Litigation Campaign Assessment is available. ×. Data. Alert. Save. 1Plaintiff; 1Defendant; 4Accused Products; 2 ...


XONE is a company that specializes in mobile platform development.


Xone Labs Inc. We are a technology prototype design and service consulting company for retail, finance, restaurants, tech startups, Fortune 500 companies, etc.


He is experienced working with inventors, startups, patent prosecution, and the patent office in researching Prior Art and assisting inventors prepare for patent filings. At different times he patented technologies after founding X One, Inc. and AlterWAN, where he was CEO of both firms. He has designed and installed global ...


Mar 17, 2017 ... Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, X One, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. 16-CV-06050-LHK (Judge Lucy H. Koh). Uber Technologies, the transportation network giant, recently lost a motion to dismiss a two-patent infringement suit when the Court found that Plaintiff X One, Inc.'s patent ...