Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_v._American_Mini_Theatres,_Inc.

Young v. American Mini Theatres, 427 U.S. 50 (1976), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a city ordinance of Detroit, Michigan requiring dispersal of adult businesses throughout the city. Justice Stevens ( writing for the plurality) reasoned that the speech involved here is of lower value, and the ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/427/50.html

With her on the brief were Kermit G. Bailer and John E. Cross. John H. Weston argued the cause for respondents American Mini Theatres, Inc., et al. With him on the brief were David M. Brown, Stanley Fleishman, and Sam Rosenwein. Stephen M. Taylor argued the cause for respondent Nortown Theatre, Inc. With him on the ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1975/75-312

American Mini Theaters opened two theaters that showed adult movies in the city of Detroit. Two city ordinances enacted in 1972 prohibited the opening of adult theaters within 1,000 feet of other buildings with "regulated uses" or within 500 feet of any residential district. American Mini sued city officials challenging the ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/young-v-united-parcel-service

Holding: A plaintiff alleging that the denial of an accommodation constituted disparate treatment under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which requires employers to treat “women affected by pregnancy . . . the same for all employment-related purposes . . . as other persons not so affected but similar in their ability or inability ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ohio-v-american-express-co

Jun 28 2017, Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 7, 2017, for all respondents. Jul 06 2017, Order further extending time to file the response of American Express Company, et al. to petition to and including August 21, 2017. Jul 06 2017, Brief amici curiae of Ahold U.S.A., Inc., et al. filed.

www.aclu.org/legal-document/supreme-court-decision-reno-v-aclu-et-al

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESSyllabusRENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, et al. v. ... to the Government's argument, the CDA is not saved from vagueness by the fact that its "patently offensive" standard repeats the second part of the three-prong obscenity test set forth in Miller v.

www.law360.com/cases/580518cf6343cb0b27000006

Coverage. January 3, 2018. Omnicare Deemed Joint Employer In Drivers' Wage Suit. Omnicare Inc. and a delivery service contractor jointly employ a group of drivers under the Fourth Circuit's year-old joint employment standard, a West Virginia federal judge ruled Wednesday, opening the door for the drivers to hold the ...

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-71_7l48.pdf

Jun 17, 2013 ... Syllabus. ARIZONA ET AL. v. INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF. ARIZONA, INC., ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR .... INC. Opinion of the Court. U. S. C. §1973gg et seq., “requires States to provide simpli- fied systems for registering to vote in federal elections.” Young v.

www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/osg/briefs/2010/01/01/2010-1293.pet.aa.pdf

Jan 1, 2010 ... FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONERS v. ABC, INC., ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. TO THE ... Young Broadcasting of Green Bay, Inc., WKOW Televi sion Inc. ..... community standards for the broadcast medium, sexual.