www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/case_reports/rptPendingDistrict_KYE.pdf

USA v. Michael E. Smith. 17-5074 adec. USA v. Christina Carman. 17-6119 awsub. David Ermold, et al. v. Kim Davis. 17-6120 awsub. James Yates, et al. v.

www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/17a0098p-06.pdf

May 2, 2017 ... No. 16-6412. Ermold et al. v. Davis. Page 2 .... and Moore's action, and a third case, Yates v. Davis, No. 0:15-cv-00062 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 18,. 2016) ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-666.ZS.html

Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321 . SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF KENTUCKY et al. v. DAVIS et ux.

www.scotusblog.com/2015/02/opinion-analysis-a-fisherman-slips-through-federal-prosecutors-net

Feb 25, 2015 ... In the four-one-four ruling in Yates v. United States, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted in the main opinion that the government had claimed ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/yates-v-united-states-2

Issue: Whether, to establish a violation of Brady v. Maryland, a defendant must show that he did not know of the evidence suppressed by the government and ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/yates-v-united-states

Yates v. United States ... Mar 28 2014, Reply of petitioner John L. Yates filed. Apr 3 2014 ... Jul 7 2014, Brief amici curiae of Cause of Action, et al. filed.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/553/328

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF KENTUCKY et al. v. ... welcome the weaker municipal issues that would lose their local market homes after a Davis victory.

www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/100118zor_cb8e.pdf

Oct 1, 2018 ... ... UNITED STATES. ) 17-8608 ) PEMBROOK, NATHANIEL V. UNITED STATES .... D., ET AL. ) 17-1534 ) BANK MARKAZI V. PETERSON, DEBORAH, ET AL. 17- 1678 ... YATES, FERNANDO V. WEST CONTRA COSTA SCHOOL DIST. 18- 5137. DANIEL ... ET AL. 17-1343. DAVIS, SHAWN L. V. MISSISSIPPI.

www.eccourts.org/yates-associates-construction-company-ltd-et-al-v-oil-nut-bay-inc

Yates Associates Construction Company Ltd et al v Oil Nut Bay Inc. Eastern Caribbean ...... Prev. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al v Kenneth Krys et al · Next.