en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yates_v._United_States

Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298 (1957), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the ... Supreme Court of the United States. Argued October 8–9, 1956. Decided June 17, 1957. Full case name, Yates, et al. v. United States. Citations, 354 U.S. 298 ...

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-kyed-0_15-cv-00046/pdf/USCOURTS-kyed-0_15-cv-00046-0.pdf

Sep 15, 2017 ... Davis, et al., 0:15-cv-46-DLB-EBA; and (3) Yates, et al. v. ... In contrast to the Miller Plaintiffs, the Ermold and Yates Plaintiffs do not pursue.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/588/18-431

United States v. Davis et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. No. 18–431. Argued April 17, 2019—Decided June 24, 2019.

www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/17a0098p-06.pdf

May 2, 2017 ... No. 16-6412. Ermold et al. v. Davis. Page 2 .... and Moore's action, and a third case, Yates v. Davis, No. 0:15-cv-00062 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 18,. 2016) ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/banister-v-davis

Issue: Whether and under what circumstances a timely Rule 59(e) motion should be recharacterized as a second or successive habeas petition under Gonzalez ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ayestas-v-davis

Feb 08 2017, Brief of respondent Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, ... Aug 08 2017, Brief amici curiae of States of Arizona, et al. filed.

www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20170724760

Jul 21, 2017 ... Kim DAVIS, individually and in her official capacity, et al., Defendants. .... Miller v. Davis, No. 15-5880, 2015 WL 10692640, at *1 (6th Cir. Aug. ...... James Yates and Will Smith, plaintiffs in another companion case, also ...

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18-525_m6hn.pdf

Jun 3, 2019 ... FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS v. DAVIS. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF ..... of appeals all the way to the Supreme Court.

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-666.ZS.html

May 19, 2008 ... DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF KENTUCKY et al. v. DAVIS et ux. ... issues that would lose their local market homes after a Davis victory.