Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._United_States_District_Court

United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972), also known as the Keith case, was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that upheld, in a unanimous 8-0 ruling, the requirements of the Fourth Amendment in cases of domestic surveillance targeting a domestic threat. The United States charged John ...

www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/1E75543037022E9F85257FDC00501CDD/$file/14-1251-1621522.pdf

Jun 24, 2016 ... were Jonathan D. Hacker and Jason Zarrow. Chris Stovic, pro se, filed the briefs ... brief were Alisa B. Klein, Attorney, U.S. Department of. Justice, Robert D. .... presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.” Russello v. United. States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983).

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/407/297

407 U.S. 297. United States v. United States District Court (No. 70-153). Argued: February 24, 1972. Decided: June 19, 1972. ___. Syllabus; Opinion, Powell; Concurrence, Douglas; Concurrence, White. Syllabus. The United States charged three defendants with conspiring to destroy, and one of them with destroying, ...

www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/17-432-cert-rb.pdf

jected American Pipe tolling for class actions will jet- tison that rule and adopt the Ninth Circuit's holding below in light of Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates,. P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 559 U.S. 393 (2010), and Smith v. Bayer Corp., 564 U.S. 299 (2011). But if anything, those cases confirm that American Pipe ap-.

www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/retroactivity-the-due-process-clause-and-the-federal-question-in-montgomery-v-louisiana

Sep 28, 2015 ... Introduction The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Montgomery v. Louisiana to determine whether the Court's holding in Miller v. Alabama, ... The U.S. Supreme Court possesses jurisdiction to review only those state court decisions that present a dispositive federal question. Put slightly differently ...

www.ssrn.com/abstract=2530536

Nov 26, 2014 ... Alabama, retroactivity, Teague v. Lane, habeas corpus. Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation. Zarrow, Jason and Milliken, William, The Retroactivity of Substantive Rules to Cases on Collateral Review and the AEDPA, with a Special Focus on Miller v. Alabama (November 25, 2014). Indiana Law Review ...

journals.iupui.edu/index.php/inlawrev/article/viewFile/18972/18873

Harvard Law School, J.D., 2013. Jason Zarrow is currently an associate at O' Melveny and Myers LLP. ** Harvard Law School, J.D., 2013. William H. Milliken is a law clerk to the Honorable. Sandra L. Lynch, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. 1. See, e.g., Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655 ...

www.nam.org/Advocacy/The-Center-for-Legal-Action/Briefs-Online/2017/NAM-Amicus-Brief-in-RJ-Reynolds-Tobacco-Company-v-Graham-(S-Ct)

Washington, D.C. 20062. (202) 463-5337. Counsel for the Chamber of. Commerce of the United. States of America. ANTON METLITSKY. (Counsel of Record) ... N.W. Suite 400. Washington, D.C. 20036. (202) 682-1163. Counsel for the American. Tort Reform Association. JASON ZARROW. O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP.

tagg.ou.edu/tagg/signup

LICENSEE may not use and shall not use or otherwise export and/or re-export the PROGRAM except as authorized by United States laws and the laws of the ... of) any country subject to U.S. embargoes or trade sanctions that would prohibit such an export or re-export; or (b) to anyone on the U.S. Treasury Department list of ...