Did you mean: vF Brands, Inc ?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moseley_v._V_Secret_Catalogue,_Inc.

Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), is a decision by the Supreme Court ... By 1998 the company spent $55 million in advertising its brand , operated 750 Victoria's Secret stores, ... PF Brands, Inc. , 191 F.3d 208 (2d Cir.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/50/188/2332742

Nabisco, Inc. v. PF Brands, Inc., 50 F. Supp. 2d 188 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) case opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

cyber.harvard.edu/people/tfisher/1999%20Nabisco%20Abridged.pdf

Nabisco, Inc. and Nabisco Brands Company (collectively "Nabisco") appeal from ... District Judge) upon the motion of Pepperidge Farm, Inc. and PF Brands, Inc.

www.nytimes.com/1999/02/04/nyregion/nabisco-sees-red-herring-but-pepperidge-farm-wins-fish-suit.html

Feb 4, 1999 ... Federal Judge Shira A Scheindlin orders Nabisco Inc not to sell new ... on the Goldfish brand and that Pepperidge Farm's fish shape should not ...

repository.jmls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1048&context=ripl

PF Brands, Inc.13 and TCPIP Holding Co. v. Haar Communications, Inc.14 The Second Circuit would clearly restrict application of the FTDA to trademarks that ...

www.finnegan.com/en/insights/what-do-sugarfinas-bento-box-the-heinz-dip-and-squeeze-and-the-pepperidge-farm-goldfish-have-in-common-design-rights.html

Oct 22, 2018 ... But, you might be surprised to learn that many companies also turn .... PF Brands, Inc.50 F. Supp. 2d 1888 (S.D.N.Y. 1999). 12 Sugarfina, Inc., v.

www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2406654/tiffany-nj-inc-v-ebay-inc

Jul 14, 2008 ... Tiffany closely controls the distribution of Tiffany-branded goods. ... Corp. v. Mimran, 975 F.2d 58, 61-62 (2d Cir. 1992) ("As a general rule, trademark law does not reach the sale of ...... PF Brands, Inc., 191 F.3d 208, 215 n.

scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1449&context=btlj

V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003) [hereinafter VSecret. 6. ... ond Circuit's opinion in Nabisco, Inc. v. PF Brands, Inc., 191 F.3d 208 (2d Cir. 1999),.

www.bu.edu/law/journals-archive/scitech/volume122/documents/simon_web_000.pdf

actual lost revenues constitutes the most obvious means of establishing dilution); see also. Nabisco, Inc., v. PF Brands, Inc., 191 F.3d 208, 214, 227-28 (2nd Cir.