Did you mean: vF Brands, Inc ?


Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), is a decision by the Supreme Court ... By 1998 the company spent $55 million in advertising its brand , operated 750 Victoria's Secret stores, ... PF Brands, Inc. , 191 F.3d 208 (2d Cir.


This list contains an alphabetical listing of historically significant or leading case law in the area of US trademark law. Contents: Top; 0–9; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J ; K; L; M; N; O; P; Q; R; S; T; U; V; W; X; Y; Z. A[edit]. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. .... Nabisco, Inc. v. PF Brands, Inc. 191 F.3d 208 (2nd Cir. 1999); New Kids on the Block ...


Nabisco, Inc. v. PF Brands, Inc., 50 F. Supp. 2d 188 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) case opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.


Nabisco, Inc. and Nabisco Brands Company (collectively "Nabisco") appeal from ... District Judge) upon the motion of Pepperidge Farm, Inc. and PF Brands, Inc.


Feb 4, 1999 ... Federal Judge Shira A Scheindlin orders Nabisco Inc not to sell new ... on the Goldfish brand and that Pepperidge Farm's fish shape should not ...


PF Brands, Inc.13 and TCPIP Holding Co. v. Haar Communications, Inc.14 The Second Circuit would clearly restrict application of the FTDA to trademarks that ...


Dec 3, 2009 ... Cf. Nabisco v. PF Brands, Inc., 191 F.3d 208, 213, 218 (2d Cir.1999) (observing that Pepperidge Farm's famous "goldfish" mark may be ...


(1927) (cited in Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 429 (2003)). ..... PF. Brands, Inc.. 191 F.3d 208, 216 n.2 (2d Cir. 1999): TCPIP Holding Co. v.


actual lost revenues constitutes the most obvious means of establishing dilution); see also. Nabisco, Inc., v. PF Brands, Inc., 191 F.3d 208, 214, 227-28 (2nd Cir.