Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), is a decision by the Supreme Court ... By 1998 the company spent $55 million in advertising its brand , operated 750 Victoria's Secret stores, ... PF Brands, Inc. , 191 F.3d 208 (2d Cir.
Nabisco, Inc. v. PF Brands, Inc., 50 F. Supp. 2d 188 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) case opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Nabisco, Inc. and Nabisco Brands Company (collectively "Nabisco") appeal from ... District Judge) upon the motion of Pepperidge Farm, Inc. and PF Brands, Inc.
Feb 4, 1999 ... Federal Judge Shira A Scheindlin orders Nabisco Inc not to sell new ... on the Goldfish brand and that Pepperidge Farm's fish shape should not ...
Oct 27, 2016 ... A nationwide seller decides on a new brand; it conducts trademark searches, verifies there are no ... The Third Circuit considered that question in A&H Sportswear, Inc. v. ..... PF Brands, Inc., 191 F.3d 208, 228 (2dCir.1999).
PF Brands, Inc.13 and TCPIP Holding Co. v. Haar Communications, Inc.14 The Second Circuit would clearly restrict application of the FTDA to trademarks that ...
The decision in Victor's Little Secret v. .... PF Brands, Inc., the Court agreed with a district court which had found that Nabisco, Inc.'s use of an orange, bite-sized, ...
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003) [hereinafter VSecret. 6. ... ond Circuit's opinion in Nabisco, Inc. v. PF Brands, Inc., 191 F.3d 208 (2d Cir. 1999),.
actual lost revenues constitutes the most obvious means of establishing dilution); see also. Nabisco, Inc., v. PF Brands, Inc., 191 F.3d 208, 214, 227-28 (2nd Cir.