Did you mean: vF Brands, Inc ?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moseley_v._V_Secret_Catalogue,_Inc.

Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), is a decision by the Supreme Court ... By 1998 the company spent $55 million in advertising its brand , operated 750 Victoria's Secret stores, ... PF Brands, Inc. , 191 F.3d 208 (2d Cir.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/50/188/2332742

Nabisco, Inc. v. PF Brands, Inc., 50 F. Supp. 2d 188 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) case opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

cyber.harvard.edu/people/tfisher/1999%20Nabisco%20Abridged.pdf

Nabisco, Inc. and Nabisco Brands Company (collectively "Nabisco") appeal from ... District Judge) upon the motion of Pepperidge Farm, Inc. and PF Brands, Inc.

www.nytimes.com/1999/02/04/nyregion/nabisco-sees-red-herring-but-pepperidge-farm-wins-fish-suit.html

Feb 4, 1999 ... Federal Judge Shira A Scheindlin orders Nabisco Inc not to sell new ... on the Goldfish brand and that Pepperidge Farm's fish shape should not ...

www.cooley.com/news/insight/2016/2016-10-27-squirrels-armed-with-bazookas

Oct 27, 2016 ... A nationwide seller decides on a new brand; it conducts trademark searches, verifies there are no ... The Third Circuit considered that question in A&H Sportswear, Inc. v. ..... PF Brands, Inc., 191 F.3d 208, 228 (2dCir.1999).

repository.jmls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1048&context=ripl

PF Brands, Inc.13 and TCPIP Holding Co. v. Haar Communications, Inc.14 The Second Circuit would clearly restrict application of the FTDA to trademarks that ...

gbr.pepperdine.edu/2010/08/the-uncertain-world-of-trademark-dilution

The decision in Victor's Little Secret v. .... PF Brands, Inc., the Court agreed with a district court which had found that Nabisco, Inc.'s use of an orange, bite-sized, ...

scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1449&context=btlj

V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003) [hereinafter VSecret. 6. ... ond Circuit's opinion in Nabisco, Inc. v. PF Brands, Inc., 191 F.3d 208 (2d Cir. 1999),.

www.bu.edu/law/journals-archive/scitech/volume122/documents/simon_web_000.pdf

actual lost revenues constitutes the most obvious means of establishing dilution); see also. Nabisco, Inc., v. PF Brands, Inc., 191 F.3d 208, 214, 227-28 (2nd Cir.